🎹
Hello
🎹
Hello
  • Crowrite
  • 2025
    • 0115-file saving
    • 0122-better way to use my own code
    • 0311-MCA
    • 0331-PSM simulation
    • 0409-neovim-config
    • 0415-git undo
    • 0416-needlets
    • 0417-pytest
    • 0422-python import
  • 2024
    • 0209-Linux and git basic command
    • 0213-How to take notes for research
    • 0214-Scientific method
    • 0215-Scientific method
    • 0226-it is customary to mask detected point sources in order to eliminate this spurious contribution
    • 0228-Ali-first light
    • 0314-python logger
    • 0411- Fan region and Gum nebula, Coma and Virgo cluster
    • 0417-vec.ctypes.data
    • 0419-Stokes parameter
    • 0430-PBH
    • 0521-Astrometry
    • 0523-classmethod and static method
    • 0619-Gaussian profile
    • 0619-EB noise level
    • 0703-bias from wrong covariance matrix estimation
    • 0718-np.random.choice
    • 0814-test-inline-formula
    • 0814-healpy lon lat scope
    • 0816-change $ to $$
    • 0821-len() for np.ndarray
    • 0821-angdist snippets and hp.ang2pix lonlat range
    • 0823-same name of some variable
    • 0910-FUTURE CODE
    • 0918-add prior to chi square fitting
    • 0929-PS results comparison
    • 1015-conference
    • 1031-unit test
    • 1108-git tag
    • 1118-nested title in markdown
    • 1122-some markdown format
    • 1205-python local variable
    • 1210-BAO
    • 1217-pandas index
  • Biophysics
    • Claycomb
      • Terminology
  • QUATA
    • term
  • PHYSICS
    • LENPS
      • 250409-peaks finder
      • 250418-tSZ effect
      • 240418-tSZ效应
    • PSILC
      • 0221-Statistical properties of polarized radio sources at high frequency... arxiv:1003.5846
      • 0223-Primordial B-mode Diagnostics and Self Calibrating the CMB Polarization arxiv:0912.3532
      • 0227-(WMAP) Observations: Foreground Emission arxiv:0302208
      • 0229-Masking versus removing point sources in CMB data: arxiv:1207.2315
      • 0301-Galactic cold Clump
      • 0305-constrained realization and CMB S4
      • 0306-BICEP setup
      • 0308-QUIJOTE
      • 0311-SPT point source catelogue
      • 0312-Jaffe Thesis: Foreground Challenge to CMB Polarization: Present Methodologies and New Concepts
      • 0318-The radio source counts at 15 GHz and their implications for cm-wave CMB imaging
      • 0320-Component separation methods for the PLANCK mission
      • 0328-Sparsity
      • 0329-Morphological component analysis on the sphere
      • 0326-Low-$\ell$ CMB analysis and inpainting Starck 2013
      • 0410-Planck 2018 V Planck 2015 IX
      • 0520-ACT Extragalactic Point Sources in the Southern Surveys at 150, 220 and 280 GHz
      • 0522-AGN Two-season ACTPol Extragalactic Point Sources and their Polarization properties
      • 0528-ACT DR5 maps of 18 000 square degrees of the microwave sky from ACT 2008-2018 data
      • 0828-purity and completeness
      • 0911-EB leakage test
      • 1011-power spectrum estimation for partial sky
      • 1002-apodization
      • 1015-215GHz and 95GHz / th noise power spectrum
      • 1020-compare different method pipeline-star
      • 1030-smoothing maps precautions
      • 1029-mask small scale structure
      • 1031-inpainting debug
      • 1114-cut how many number PS can give good estimate of other components
      • 1202-lmax for maps
      • 1203-theory noise level
      • 1225-multiunion and reduce lists
      • 250107-Convolution
      • 250118-recycling method factor
      • 250124-r constraint
      • 250128-new r constraint
      • 250225-TODO
Powered by GitBook
On this page
Edit on GitHub
  1. PHYSICS
  2. PSILC

1031-inpainting debug

Previous1029-mask small scale structureNext1114-cut how many number PS can give good estimate of other components

Last updated 5 months ago

Maybe other inpainting method should be tested.

Also, it seems the EB leakage correction is not enough, so we have to figure out if we should add a bigger mask. We should see its performance first, if bigger mask are needed, see the effect scope of leakage!

before inpaint
after inpaint